PDA

View Full Version : Warrior or Rogue


Ferdin
04-11-2006, 04:12 AM
I have already posted this topic on the normal World of Warcraft Forums to no avail :(

I really need some input on this, as much as you dread doing this for probably the billionth time, it would help me so much. All i want is your honest opinion on which one is funner to play in PvP. I know many of you will say that,"It depends on what you like". Thats not what i want, i want your opinon on it, and those who have played both in PvP at 60 would be Great!!

Thank you very much for your time

~Ferdin

Mincemaker
04-11-2006, 10:10 AM
Rogue = Spellcaster slayer. Sneaks behind enemy lines and remove all their mages, priests, warlocks and the occasional hunter.

Warrior = Frontline fighters. Kills kills and kills everybody that stand right in his face, and give his enemy grief. His job is to mow down everything in his path.

Two different classes play two different roles in PVP especially in BG.

However, in open PVP, nothing beats stalking as a rogue. Stalk, wait, slay. This is the rogue's playstyle. Fighting dirty is the name of the game for a rogue.

For warriors, however, it is still 'mowing down everything in front of you'. So it is a very straightfoward approach in battle, just go on and try and bulldoze everything.

Which do you want to be? A juggernaut or a murderous shadow?

Once again, it is dependent of playstyle. You cannot just compare a rogue and a warrior seeing that they do things very differently. I, personally, love playing a rogue. Challenging, dirty, sneaky.

Owoc
04-11-2006, 10:44 AM
A very important thing here is that a warrior needs healing support to "mow down everything in his path". Non-healing class vs healing class or focused fire = bad.

Mincemaker
04-11-2006, 02:06 PM
A very important thing here is that a warrior needs healing support to "mow down everything in his path". Non-healing class vs healing class or focused fire = bad.

Agreed. For a warrior to inflict maximum damage, he needs healing support. Yes, they are tough, but even the toughest wall crumbles if every single person in the immediate vicinity starts hammering at it.

Ferdin
04-11-2006, 02:14 PM
Thanks very very much for your input :)

It is still a hard decesion but i think i am closing in on an answer

Genrisho
09-11-2006, 01:59 AM
As a "mower of battlefields" i would have to say, The rogue deffinitely has its moments, though in a lucky AV as a 53 warrior i singlehandidly downed a 60 rogue in about 5 seconds...overpower FTW! but that aside, a stunlock rogue can, as the name implies, stun ur a$$ til ur a fried up caster or meat shield...So if u want that insane dps and warm tingly feeling that slaughtering a mage in 1 shot...go witha Rogue or if u enjoy the feel of melee combat with 20 players all around you, your team dying and the sight of them big a$$ burst dmg crits go witha warrior