Uhmmm, Saddlebags?

[caldepen]

This has obviously been around for awhile but Iwas wondering why Blizzard has opted against this. A portable bank attached to your mount, whenever you are mounted you have access to your saddlebags. So you cannot switch around while in battle but it would save the annoyance of returning to a bank all the time or having a nekid dude running around the capital city acting as your banker.

Multipurpose really, you can use it to hold your other armor setup or for putting all your mined, gathered, skinned stuff there...

[Kugan]

Hmmm. My mount is really amazing. When I’m not using it, it goes into my bags.

So what you are asking for, is the ability to put bags into bags. Not a bad idea, but I’m pretty sure Blizz won’t implement it.

[thorleader]

ya, prob because of the bad within a bag idea

[Wintrow]

I disagree, it wouldn't be a bag in bag thing. It would more be a "your horse is a way to consult your bank contents"-thing. Not a third storage next to your bags AND your bank.

Although, in relation to that: I would find needing multiple sets of armor much less annoying if I could consult my bank at every inn. Still not the same as "in the field", but if you're out there "in the wild" a bank is pretty far off...

[caldepen]

the bag within the bag thing is just nitpicking. It is all about the function. It is more access for you and the neat thing is that you could not access it during combat so it would not be an unfair advantage.

As far as the bag within the bag thing they could easily change it to a summon spell that goes in your book. I always thought the mount in your bag was kind of silly anyway.

[Polaba]

Warriors have no mana, how will they have horsies :grin:

[caldepen]

again with the nitpicking! Thats an issue easily resolved. Make it one of their stances or whatever!